Nick
817a97abd9
Scaffolding-first rebuild of the reverted ad-hoc attempt (1e6cb4d), per
Nick's 2026-10-04 directive that all coding replacements run through the
construction pipeline:
- Need submitted with acceptance criteria + constraints (zero-dep Go,
pinned toolchain, canaries-first); resolution REUSE, approval covered
by Nick's Go-frontend directive; contract generated and approved.
- CANARY LANDED FIRST (canary_rune_entry.py restored; module absent ->
canary red proves ordering), then the module restored from the reverted
reference and the canary went 12/12 green.
- Contract lifecycle driven to close: observe -> verifying -> close.
Closure verdict (honest): all four delivered surfaces land in
genuinely_unexpected_new — the spine/structural registry does not model
the new Go surface, the canary, the pin file, or the workflow yet. That
IS the coverage signal the closure exists to emit; the spine-modeling
gap is now a recorded follow-up across H-wave deliveries.
Retrofit closures also completed under the same directive:
- Slice 2 (evidence-provenance): BUILDER-2026-10-04T05:23:17Z-cli — all
six ported modules correctly_predicted; crate + canaries + shim battery
honestly unmodeled.
- Slice 1 (query-memory): BUILDER-2026-10-04T05:24:11Z-cli —
module:query_memory correctly_predicted; crate + canaries unmodeled.
- BUILDER-2026-10-04T05:14:20Z-cli (v1) and ...:18:52Z (v2) stand as
labeled learning artifacts (entity-vocabulary mismatch).
go test 6/6, go vet clean, canary 12/12 (desktop + bare-HOME CI sim),
henxels exit 0, pin check PASS.
2 lines
7 B
Plaintext
2 lines
7 B
Plaintext
1.27.1
|