Memory Atlas — I: Associative / Content-Addressable Memory #384

Closed
opened 2026-09-19 21:19:04 +01:00 by conductor · 5 comments
Owner

PARENT: Memory Research Atlas — Pre-T1 (#375)
PRIORITY: HIGH

RUNE REQUIREMENTS AFFECTED: R13,R20,R28; spreading activation, Hopfield, PPR; trust-laundering and amplification prevention

RESEARCH PIPELINE: ISSUE → INWARD → OUTWARD → APPLICABILITY → INNOVATION → ADVERSARIAL → SYNTHESIS → QUALIFY

EXPECTED OUTPUT: durable research artifact (research/memory-atlas/families/), mechanism classifications (COVERED/ADOPT/ADAPT/EXPERIMENT/FUTURE/REJECT/NOT_RELEVANT) with confidence + architecture impact, unresolved questions, architecture-changing flag.

NO-BUILD BOUNDARY: research only — no production implementation.

CLOSURE FORMAT: per Atlas mandate §2 (domain, requirements, current equivalent, mechanisms, evidence, costs, failure modes, LLM-dependency effect, offline suitability, century-scale implications, architecture impact, applicability, innovation, classification, confidence, unknowns, T1-change flag, proof-required, rejection criterion).

PARENT: Memory Research Atlas — Pre-T1 (#375) PRIORITY: HIGH RUNE REQUIREMENTS AFFECTED: R13,R20,R28; spreading activation, Hopfield, PPR; trust-laundering and amplification prevention RESEARCH PIPELINE: ISSUE → INWARD → OUTWARD → APPLICABILITY → INNOVATION → ADVERSARIAL → SYNTHESIS → QUALIFY EXPECTED OUTPUT: durable research artifact (research/memory-atlas/families/), mechanism classifications (COVERED/ADOPT/ADAPT/EXPERIMENT/FUTURE/REJECT/NOT_RELEVANT) with confidence + architecture impact, unresolved questions, architecture-changing flag. NO-BUILD BOUNDARY: research only — no production implementation. CLOSURE FORMAT: per Atlas mandate §2 (domain, requirements, current equivalent, mechanisms, evidence, costs, failure modes, LLM-dependency effect, offline suitability, century-scale implications, architecture impact, applicability, innovation, classification, confidence, unknowns, T1-change flag, proof-required, rejection criterion).
conductor added the researchmemory-atlas labels 2026-09-19 21:19:04 +01:00

⚠️ Priority gate: this issue has no priority. Assign exactly one of P0 — critical (spine/correctness/blocks), P1 — high (material value or real defect), P2 — medium (quality/consolidation), P3 — low (measurement/deferred). An issue without a priority is not filed.

⚠️ **Priority gate:** this issue has no priority. Assign exactly one of **P0 — critical** (spine/correctness/blocks), **P1 — high** (material value or real defect), **P2 — medium** (quality/consolidation), **P3 — low** (measurement/deferred). An issue without a priority is not filed.
gitea-actions Bot added the custodianfeatureinfrastructurememory labels 2026-09-19 21:26:17 +01:00

⚠️ Priority gate: this issue has no priority. Assign exactly one of P0 — critical (spine/correctness/blocks), P1 — high (material value or real defect), P2 — medium (quality/consolidation), P3 — low (measurement/deferred). An issue without a priority is not filed.

⚠️ **Priority gate:** this issue has no priority. Assign exactly one of **P0 — critical** (spine/correctness/blocks), **P1 — high** (material value or real defect), **P2 — medium** (quality/consolidation), **P3 — low** (measurement/deferred). An issue without a priority is not filed.
Author
Owner

Research qualification — Memory Research Atlas

This child domain is researched and qualified. Findings, mechanism classifications (COVERED/ADOPT/ADAPT/EXPERIMENT/FUTURE/REJECT with confidence + architecture impact), adversarial risks, and T1-impact flags are persisted in the durable artifact:

research/memory-atlas/families/ (see FINAL_REPORT.md and the parent epic #375 for cross-family synthesis).

Verdict fed into the parent Atlas requirement-coverage matrix and architecture-changer registry. NO-BUILD boundary respected: no production implementation. Child closes COMPLETE.

## Research qualification — Memory Research Atlas This child domain is researched and qualified. Findings, mechanism classifications (COVERED/ADOPT/ADAPT/EXPERIMENT/FUTURE/REJECT with confidence + architecture impact), adversarial risks, and T1-impact flags are persisted in the durable artifact: **research/memory-atlas/families/** (see FINAL_REPORT.md and the parent epic #375 for cross-family synthesis). Verdict fed into the parent Atlas requirement-coverage matrix and architecture-changer registry. NO-BUILD boundary respected: no production implementation. Child closes COMPLETE.
Author
Owner

Research qualification — Memory Research Atlas

This child domain is researched and qualified. Findings, mechanism classifications (COVERED/ADOPT/ADAPT/EXPERIMENT/FUTURE/REJECT with confidence + architecture impact), adversarial risks, and T1-impact flags are persisted in the durable artifact: research/memory-atlas/families/ (see FINAL_REPORT.md and parent epic #375 for cross-family synthesis).

Verdict fed into the parent Atlas requirement-coverage matrix and architecture-changer registry. NO-BUILD boundary respected: no production implementation. Child closes COMPLETE.

## Research qualification — Memory Research Atlas This child domain is researched and qualified. Findings, mechanism classifications (COVERED/ADOPT/ADAPT/EXPERIMENT/FUTURE/REJECT with confidence + architecture impact), adversarial risks, and T1-impact flags are persisted in the durable artifact: **research/memory-atlas/families/** (see FINAL_REPORT.md and parent epic #375 for cross-family synthesis). Verdict fed into the parent Atlas requirement-coverage matrix and architecture-changer registry. NO-BUILD boundary respected: no production implementation. Child closes COMPLETE.
Author
Owner

R1_DEEP_RESEARCH_COMPLETE

Domain: Associative / Content-Addressable Memory (#384, eighth R1 domain)

Pipeline: ISSUE PASS · INWARD PASS · OUTWARD PASS (23-entry source ledger; 13 arXiv-verified) · APPLICABILITY PASS (6 mechanisms) · INNOVATION PASS (2 candidates) · ADVERSARIAL PASS (independent; 5 attacks: 3 succeeded, 2 failed) · SYNTHESIS PASS (7-row matrix) · QUALIFY PASS (9 mechanisms)

R0 reconciliation: CONFIRMED 3 · REFINED 3 · OVERTURNED 1 · STILL_UNKNOWN 0 · Sum = 7

Architecture-changing findings:

  1. PPR associative retrieval is PREMATURE at Rune's graph density (272 edges, similarity-only — duplicates embedding space; prerequisite = complementary edges from consolidation-time link extraction)
  2. Fan normalization CONFIRMED with quantitative law (2606.28327: logarithmic interference replicated humans+RAG)
  3. Per-step semantic gating beats static PPR (+3.6-7.4 F1, 2606.30133) — SQLite-compatible, no graph DB needed
  4. Trust-gated propagation at retrieval time OVERTURNED (TMA-NM machine-checked proof: read-time trust is malleable); novelty shifts to origin-binding at write time
  5. Bridge-node recall metric needs end-task answer-F1 gate (CatRAG's reasoning completeness) to prevent hub-artifact false positives

Experiments: bridge-node recall + end-task gate (the defining experiment, gated on complementary edges)

Remaining unknowns: minimum graph density for PPR value; complementary-edge schema; multi-cue query frequency

Evidence saturation: EVIDENCE SATURATION REACHED (7 branches)

Mutation audit: PRODUCTION_MUTATION = NONE

Canonical folder: research/memory-atlas-r1/I-associative-memory/
Domain master: I_ASSOCIATIVE_MEMORY_R1_MASTER.md
No production implementation.

## R1_DEEP_RESEARCH_COMPLETE **Domain:** Associative / Content-Addressable Memory (#384, eighth R1 domain) **Pipeline:** ISSUE PASS · INWARD PASS · OUTWARD PASS (23-entry source ledger; 13 arXiv-verified) · APPLICABILITY PASS (6 mechanisms) · INNOVATION PASS (2 candidates) · ADVERSARIAL PASS (independent; 5 attacks: 3 succeeded, 2 failed) · SYNTHESIS PASS (7-row matrix) · QUALIFY PASS (9 mechanisms) **R0 reconciliation:** CONFIRMED 3 · REFINED 3 · OVERTURNED 1 · STILL_UNKNOWN 0 · Sum = 7 **Architecture-changing findings:** 1. PPR associative retrieval is PREMATURE at Rune's graph density (272 edges, similarity-only — duplicates embedding space; prerequisite = complementary edges from consolidation-time link extraction) 2. Fan normalization CONFIRMED with quantitative law (2606.28327: logarithmic interference replicated humans+RAG) 3. Per-step semantic gating beats static PPR (+3.6-7.4 F1, 2606.30133) — SQLite-compatible, no graph DB needed 4. Trust-gated propagation at retrieval time OVERTURNED (TMA-NM machine-checked proof: read-time trust is malleable); novelty shifts to origin-binding at write time 5. Bridge-node recall metric needs end-task answer-F1 gate (CatRAG's reasoning completeness) to prevent hub-artifact false positives **Experiments:** bridge-node recall + end-task gate (the defining experiment, gated on complementary edges) **Remaining unknowns:** minimum graph density for PPR value; complementary-edge schema; multi-cue query frequency **Evidence saturation:** EVIDENCE SATURATION REACHED (7 branches) **Mutation audit:** PRODUCTION_MUTATION = NONE **Canonical folder:** research/memory-atlas-r1/I-associative-memory/ **Domain master:** I_ASSOCIATIVE_MEMORY_R1_MASTER.md **No production implementation.**
Sign in to join this conversation.
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: conductor/rune#384